Redactions in this section could not be restored; shown by [ ].
S E C R E T
I. PRELIMINARY STEPS
Representatives of British Intelligence met with Near
East and Africa (NEA) Division representatives in Washing-
ton during November and December 1952 for the purpose of
discussing joint war and staybehind plans in Iran. In
attendance for British Intelligence were Mr. Christopher
Montague Woodhouse, recently Chief of Station for British
Intelligence in Tehran; Mr. Samuel Falle of the British
Intelligence station in Tehran; and Mr. John Bruse
Lockhart, SIS Washington representative. In attendance
for NEA Division were Mr. Kermit Roosevelt, Chief of
Division, Mr. John H. Leavitt, Chief of Iran Branch;
Mr. John W. Pendleton, Deputy Chief of Division; and
Mr. James A. Darling, Chief of NEA Paramilitary Staff.
Although it was not on the previously agreed agenda
of the meeting, British Intelligence representatives brought
up the proposition of a joint political action to remove
Prime Minister Mossadeq. The NEA Division had not intended
to discuss this question at all and was unprepared to do so.
The meeting concluded without any decision being made and
with the NEA Division committing itself only to study in
more detail the political action proposals advanced by
British Intelligence.
S E C R E T
S E C R E T
In March 1953 a telegram was received from the Tehran
Station which stated that General [ ] had
contacted the assistant military attache and had requested
Ambassador Henderson's views as to whether or nor the US
Government was interested in covertly supporting an Iranian
military effort to oust Premier Mossadeq. A meeting was
held in the Embassy at which Headquarters personnel, then
in the field, and station personnel were in attendance.
A cautiously worded reply was drafted at Headquarters and
its substance delivered to General [ ]. The reply
did not commit the United States in any way but was mildly
encouraging and revealed some US interest in the idea.
On the basis of the [ ] overture and other
clear signs that determined opposition to Mossadeq was tak-
ing shape, and in view of the totally destructive and reck-
less attitude of the government of Prime Minister Mossadeq,
General Walter Bedell Smith, Undersecretary of State,
determined that the US Government could no longer approve
of the Mossadeq government and would prefer a successor
government in which there would be no National Frontists.
The change in policy was communicated to CIA, and the NEA
Division was informed that it was authorized to consider
operations which would contribute to the fall of the
Mossadeq government. The Department of State and CIA
2
S E C R E T
S E C R E T
jointly informed Ambassador Henderson and the Chief of
Station, Roger Goiran, of the new policy and of the opera-
tional authorization. The Director, on 4 April 1953,
approved a budget of $1,000,000 which could be used by
the Tehran Station in any way that would bring about the
fall of Mossadeq. Full authority was given to Ambassador
Henderson and the Chief of Station enabling any part or
all of the $1,000,000 to be used without further authority,
as long as the Ambassador and the station concurred.
On 16 April 1953 a comprehensive study entitled:
"Factors Involved in the Overthrow of Mossadeq" was
completed. The Study indicated that a Shah-Gneral Zahedi
combination, supported by CIA local assets and financial
backing, would have a good chance of overthrowing Mossadeq,
particularly if this combination should be able to get the
largest mobs in the streets and if a sizable portion of
the Tehran garrison refused to carry out Mossadeq's orders.
Subsequent contact was made with General [ ].
Although his motives appeared serious, it soon became
apparent that he had no concrete plan and was in fact in
no position to take action against Mossadeq.
General Zahedi, who at one time was a member of
Mossadeq's cabinet, stood out as the only major personality
in undisguised opposition to Mossadeq. For this reason
3
S E C R E T
S E C R E T
he attacted to himself a considerable following. The
Tehran Station, in April 1953, reestablished covert contact
with Zahedi through Commander Eric Pollard, the US Naval
Attache. In order to make the covert liaison with Zahedi
more effective and reliable, and also for security reasons,
Zahedi's son, Ardeshir Zahedi, was selected as the means
of contact with General Zahedi in June 1953. After 21 July
1953, contact with General Zahedi was made directly.
4
S E C R E T
|